U.S.A. scientist says he has found zero real coyote patients, and “strong evidence” that the epidemic began in the animal market

Washington – The first case COVID-19 A senior scientist told the journal that it was identified in the Chinese city of Wuhan and presented by the World Health Organization in fact several days later than previously thought and in the animal market. science Thursday.

Virologist Michael Wuruby wrote that instead of the real patient being a man who had never been to a market in Wuhan where wild and domestic animals were sold, the first known case of Covid 19 was that of a woman who worked in the market. ۔ .

For Wuruby, that key piece of information, and its other analysis Preliminary cases of COVID-19 in the cityClearly tip the scales toward an animal-borne virus.

Without any conclusive evidence, Debate has erupted among experts. About the beginning of the virus since the onset of the epidemic about two years ago.

Wuruby was one of 15 or more experts who published a science column in mid-May calling for serious consideration of the article that leaked the virus from a Wuhan laboratory.

Experts insist on investigating the origin of COVID-19.


However, in this latest article, he argues that his research into the origins of the epidemic “provides strong evidence of the authenticity of the market for live animal diseases.”

One criticism of market theory was that since health authorities had raised the alert about a suspected market-related disease case as early as December 30, 2019, it would have introduced a bias that led to other places More cases were identified than Because attention had already been drawn to it.

To counter this argument, Wurubi analyzed cases reported by two hospitals before the warning was issued.

Those issues were also largely market-linked, and those that weren’t were still geographically centered around it.

“In this city of 11 million people, half of the initial cases are connected to a place equivalent to a football field,” Wuroby told the New York Times. “It’s very difficult to describe this pattern if the epidemic doesn’t start in the market.”

A police officer stands guard outside the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market where the corona virus was detected on January 24, 2020 in Wuhan, China.

Hector Retail / AFP / Getty

Another critique of the theory was based on the fact that the first case identified was unrelated to the market.

But while the WHO report claims that the person who identified the patient as zero had been ill since December 8, according to Wuruby, he was not actually sick until December 16.

The deduction was based on a video interview he found, from a case described in a scientific article and a hospital medical record that matched that of a 41-year-old man.

This means that the first reported case will be of a woman working in the bazaar, who fell ill on December 11.

Peter Daszak, a pathologist on the WHO research team, said he was satisfied with Wuruby’s analysis.

“December 8 was a mistake,” he told the Times.


Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *